Case Study: Conveyor Length Is Too Short

A cut-to-length conveyor produces parts that become a few millimetres shorter after several metres of travel. The raw count also loses a small amount each cycle.

Case Study: Conveyor Length Is Too Short

What to Check

  • Check wheel slip, missing pulses, and input frequency.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: A temporary encoder cable routed away from the motor leads eliminates the drift. The permanent fix is corrected routing/shield bonding, not a scale change.


Case Study: Encoder Fault During Deceleration

A servo axis trips only during aggressive deceleration. Slow moves are normal.

Case Study: Encoder Fault During Deceleration

What to Check

  • Mark coupling hubs, trend following error, and inspect A/B or serial error status.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: Witness marks show hub slip under reverse torque. Correct coupling installation fixes the feedback error.

Advertisement

Case Study: New Encoder Reads Backward

A replacement incremental encoder produces clean pulses but the PLC position decreases during positive travel.

Case Study: New Encoder Reads Backward

What to Check

  • Verify machine-defined positive direction and A/B phase.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: The replacement pinout swaps A and B compared with the old cable adapter. Correct pin assignment restores direction.


Case Study: 24 V Supply Present but No Pulses

The meter shows 24 V at the cabinet power supply and the encoder is dark/dead.

Case Study: 24 V Supply Present but No Pulses

What to Check

  • Measure at the encoder connector under load.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: A corroded 0 V contact causes a 9 V drop. Repairing the connector restores operation.


Case Study: Works with Cable Unplugged

An open-collector channel measures correctly when disconnected but collapses when connected to the PLC.

Case Study: Works with Cable Unplugged

What to Check

  • Check receiver input and pull-up current.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: The signal was connected to the wrong common group, effectively loading the output. Correct wiring fixes the level.


Case Study: PLC Count Freezes at Full Speed

Encoder counts during jog but freezes near maximum rpm.

Case Study: PLC Count Freezes at Full Speed

What to Check

  • Calculate pulse frequency and check HSC/filter limits.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: The channel was wired to a normal filtered input rather than the dedicated HSC terminal.


Case Study: Homing Fails Once Every 20 Starts

The axis finds the home sensor but occasionally reports reference not found.

Case Study: Homing Fails Once Every 20 Starts

What to Check

  • Capture home sensor and Z over repeated cycles.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: The index pulse occurs just outside the search window because the coupling shifted. Re-aligning encoder index resolves it.


Case Study: Fault After Washdown

Feedback alarms occur the morning after sanitation.

Case Study: Fault After Washdown

What to Check

  • Inspect connector sealing and insulation.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: Moisture inside a connector creates leakage on one differential conductor. Replacing the connector and improving drip routing fixes it.


Case Study: False Counts When Brake Releases

A vertical axis gains several counts when the brake contactor opens.

Case Study: False Counts When Brake Releases

What to Check

  • Observe stationary raw count and scope A/B during brake switching.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: Poor shield termination allows the brake transient to couple into single-ended encoder lines. EMC correction eliminates false edges.


Case Study: Absolute Position Offset After Replacement

The machine starts with position shifted by 120 degrees after installing a compatible absolute encoder.

Case Study: Absolute Position Offset After Replacement

What to Check

  • Compare raw value, direction, preset, and controller offset.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: The new encoder factory zero differs. Applying the documented electronic preset restores machine zero.


Case Study: Intermittent Fault at Mid-Stroke

A gantry faults near the center of travel regardless of direction.

Case Study: Intermittent Fault at Mid-Stroke

What to Check

  • Inspect drag chain and trend signal by position.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: One conductor is fractured where the cable repeatedly bends. A continuous-flex replacement fixes the fault.


Case Study: Speed Oscillates at Very Low RPM

A slow-turning process shows a jumping rpm display but no physical speed change.

Case Study: Speed Oscillates at Very Low RPM

What to Check

  • Compare raw period between pulses and software update method.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: The program uses a short count window with too few pulses. Period measurement or longer averaging stabilizes the display.


Case Study: Repeated Encoder Bearing Failures

Three encoders fail within a year on the same shaft.

Case Study: Repeated Encoder Bearing Failures

What to Check

  • Inspect alignment, radial load, and bracket rigidity.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: A rigid coupling forces shaft misalignment into the encoder bearings. Correct alignment and coupling selection stop repeat failures.


Case Study: One Differential Wire Open

The encoder works slowly but faults near full speed and around contactor switching.

Case Study: One Differential Wire Open

What to Check

  • Measure A+ and A- individually and differentially.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: A- is open at a connector. The receiver loses differential noise rejection. Repairing the contact restores margin.


Case Study: Counts Exactly Four Times Too High

The machine travels 100 mm but software reports about 400 mm after controller replacement.

Case Study: Counts Exactly Four Times Too High

What to Check

  • Check PPR versus quadrature mode.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: The new HSC counts x4 edges while old software scale already multiplied by four. Correcting one side fixes the error.


Case Study: Position Jumps at 32767

Position occasionally becomes negative at the same count.

Case Study: Position Jumps at 32767

What to Check

  • Inspect integer data types.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: A 16-bit signed intermediate variable overflows. Changing calculation to a wider type resolves the apparent encoder fault.


Case Study: Serial Encoder CRC Errors

A smart encoder reports correct position most of the time but CRC error counter rises with motor load.

Case Study: Serial Encoder CRC Errors

What to Check

  • Check differential waveform, termination, route, and ground potential.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: Cable shield was not bonded at the cabinet entry. Correct EMC termination reduces errors to zero.


Case Study: Index Pulse Exists but Home Is Wrong

Z is visible on the scope and the axis homes every time, but final position is offset after maintenance.

Case Study: Index Pulse Exists but Home Is Wrong

What to Check

  • Check physical encoder orientation and home offset.
  • Preserve drive/PLC alarm history and raw data.
  • Compare the signal at encoder and receiver when relevant.

Diagnostic Sequence

  1. Reproduce the fault in the safest controlled condition.
  2. Observe raw feedback before interpreting the scaled machine value.
  3. Change one variable based on the strongest evidence.
  4. Verify the repair across repeated cycles and production speed.

Common Mistakes

  • Replacing parts before the fault is reproduced.
  • Changing scaling to hide a count problem.
  • Stopping verification after one successful cycle.

Field Rule: Encoder body was rotated on an adjustable mount, moving the index angle. Re-indexing the mount restores the reference.

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *